Cricket News

Ranji Trophy: Don't forget Shreyas Iyer's double century, this batsman made a splash – sanjeet desai scored 110 runs vs railways ranji trophy 2024 shreyas iyer

Navbharat Times - Hindi News

New Delhi: In Ranji Trophy, the match between Chhattisgarh and Railways in Elite Group D is being played in Raipur from 6th November. Railway captain Pratham Singh had won the toss in this match and decided to bowl first. However it did not prove to be so effective. Chhattisgarh's Sanjit Desai created a stir with the bat. However, due to Shreyas Iyer's double century, there is not much talk about it. Let us tell you that while playing for Mumbai against Orissa, Iyer completed his double century in 201 balls with the help of 22 fours and 8 sixes. He played a stormy innings of 233 runs in a total of 228 balls. Everyone is talking about Iyer at this time and should also do so. But meanwhile, Sanjit Desai has also shone in Ranji Trophy. Let us talk about them in detail.
Sanjit Desai played an amazing century innings

Chhattisgarh declared its innings by scoring 500 runs for 9 wickets in the first innings against Railways. Sanjit Desai played an important role in taking Chhattisgarh to this score. Desai came at number four and scored a strong century. He faced 185 balls and scored 110 runs with the help of 19 fours. After this, however, he was bowled by Karn Sharma. Sanjeet was the only centurion from his team in the first innings. Apart from this, captain Amandeep Khare scored 88 runs. Anuj Tiwari also played a good inning of 84 runs. A half-century (66) was also seen from the bat of Ajay Mandal.

Karan Sharma was the most successful bowler for Railways.

Karn Sharma was the most successful bowler for Railways against Chhattisgarh. He bowled 3 wickets in 33 overs and took 3 wickets for 111 runs. Apart from this, Adarsh ​​Singh and Akash Pandey took 2-2 wickets. Yuvraj Singh and Pratham Singh also got 1 success each. By the end of the second day's play, Railways had scored 75 runs without losing any wicket.

Source link

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *